they all look hella fun btw, why don't you start a not-MTC compo with 1st or 2nd theme for example? ^^

I like the Reverse MTC idea. Red booster -> Wall.

Duo tracks.
Rules. 30 seconds.

Voyager006 says:
Reverse MTC
o Make the worst and most ugly, ridiculous, noobish and awful map you can afford to build.
o The map which scores least points wins !
Hooray for judging hell xD

Actually I was thinking of exactly this but the fun factor criterium is not reverted.

So you have to make a map that sucks by all TMX standards but is STILL fun to play!
If you want a way to break the GP meta, here it is.

Good idea, might be problematic to define how crappy the tracks have to be though xD

An alternative scoring system: (after too many complaints on judges)
Every player who submit a track for the MTC has to judge all other tracks. If the player can't judge within a deadline, his track will be excluded.

That is a really good idea voyager, but it might be a little hard to organize who gets what judging sheet and other things. It would really be up to Kekx, though.

A track where you can only use 9 different blocks total for the entire track. You can use an unlimited amount of each of the 9 blocks you choose, but EVERYTHING must have ONLY those 9 blocks. Including scenery. (edit) including the start and finish lines. Think of it as early day simple editors that used to have only 9 blocks, but you can choose any blocks to be those 9 blocks. Land editing tools do not count.

make a track where you drive on the peak (highest point in the editor) and the nadir (lowest point in the editor). you must start on either the peak or nadir and end on the opposite extreme.

But this is too easy if you start on the highest place letting the car fall. Better if you have to place start and finish on the peak and you must reach the nadir at the middle of the track.

Voyager006 says:

DISCO PARTY!!
o There must be at least 50 blocks which cast colored lights in the map.
o Bonus points for that funky feel

Nobody Tell KEV Fan


I heard somebody mention using creative reuses (additional judging category for ingenuity). How 'bout just a reuse comp. Additional category for originality/number of reuses. No minimum reuse number, because a lack will just result in scoring penalties (So you'll probably need at least 2+ crossings to have a chance). Flow and other givens must still be maintained.
Or, on a slightly different note, some specifications could be added, so it'd be something like the April 2007 MTC; Crossroads