Wopz, I failed by a year then xD.

My point is that Alonso's car on his first win in Singapore and his win in Fuji was certified dogshit tho. I'm pretty sure nobody else would have won a single race on that, asides from maybe Raikkonen if the car didn't self-destruct or Kubica who was absolutely on fire that year. Apart from the fact that I think Nelsinho was just pissed that he was fired and he just said that story, but that's a different point of view.

Also, if you really mean to tell me you don't think the RBR has all the cheats in the oook and a good amount of those outside, we are not watching the same world championship.

Cheats? Tell me more. If it's cheating to have a car that is rather reliable and fast, we really aren't watching the same championship xD

Also, I don't think even little-Piquet would be so stupid to tell big lies. That was so obvious that I wonder how you can't believe it to be true, even though I think Alonso hadn't planned it at all, only accepted what happened.

And yep, I miss Kubica so much :/ He was likely to be one of the best but sadly his urge to drive rally had a cost. His crash at Montreal was one of the most shocking things happened in F1 for a while, even though it luckily didn't harm him almost at all.

As I said, Piquet is just a thought (after all, he constantly mentioned the contract when speaking about it". But that is not the point.
And I've said this for the past like 3 years: It's one thing to be fast, but to be over a second faster than everyone? That's not really what happens in the world of F1.

How about 2000-2004? I think only Brawn GP has been "cheater" lately, even though that can be described as genius rule playing also. I think you cant call a team cheater if there technically better than others at the moment. Remembercthat RB has grown since it was Jaguar back then, so the are not beginners with luck anymore.

I never said Brawn was completely legitimate. And Ferrari back then had some clear help. But there's also that back in 2000-2004 there wasn't many drivers to contend with Michael Schumacher, and Ferrari also had the advantage of quite possibly the best engine.

Still, do you really think that noone else would have caught up on the Red Bull for 3 years in the age where you can leak a structural part of the car without even meaning to? That's basically my problem. All those engineers are top notch professionals, sooner or later one should have copied the shit out of that RB car, yet for some reason nobody did.

Wow what a race. First half was boring, but the endhalf was great. Vettel slightly dominated it, but Alonso had a sick start and took second place, while Räikkönen got the 3rd with sick overtakes from 13th starting slot, and with a bad back he had. Unlucky Grosjean and Webber though, technical failures caused a good race to stop. Both would have been in top 6 I think.

Raikkonen be like "Fuck all of y'all Imma do my thang and whoop ass" each and every race. Makes me wonder why he only has 1 World Championship.

FT»Osaka says:
Raikkonen be like "Fuck all of y'all Imma do my thang and whoop ass" each and every race. Makes me wonder why he only has 1 World Championship.

perhaps there is a bit too much of the "Fuck all of y'all" attitude?

I certainly welcome it though..

I'd say it the Mercedes engine and McLaren car that took his championship at 2003 at least, and probably also 2005. Both times he lost the championship with very little points, with more than one DNFs during the season :/ Especially 2003 should have been Kimi's year, but the car was so easy to fail.

I agree actually. The McLarens of those days broke down easily. Particularly on a certain race in Germany. Granted that Kimi was never one who take care of the car, but I admit that a suspension shouldn't break in half for a bump in a tire.

And Tuta: It earned him the victory in Abu Dhabi 2012, so no such thing.