Illegal?!
I can site a clause... scratch that... an entire section in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act that says otherwise.
Section 107 of the Digital Millennium Copyright act states, in exact:
... says:
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include —
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.
I would assume that since user made content for a game, whether the host game is commercial or free, is considered non-commercial (nonprofit) uses AND that there is, worst case scenario, no effect on sales (it would more likely have a positive effect), it is considered fair use. That doesn't mean you can't be sued about it, however. Fair Use is a defense, not a protective right, and the ultimate decision is by a judge.
If you doubt the song is owned by the claimant, you may be entitled to SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) protection or be able to press legal charges against the claimant.
Since the EU is part of the UN, they are probably required to support some law or another that mirrors this.
Last edited by Phoenyx Imperius,