400r_ says:
Everyone is pretty much okay with this new feature, so I will not debate any further on it. However, I fear that those "quick" awards will become a new standard and totally overshadow "classic" awards.
...
For most communities, many would default to the path of least effort, without doubt, but I feel there is a base of authors on MX that gives constructive feedback in their awards. Could more do so as well? Absolutely, but I think if there is at least some distinction between an award that has a comment vs. not, I think that would have some incentive to give feedback in the award.
A bit of rambling:
I'm definitely not defending any lack of good feedback, but a possible reason of some non-feedback can also be because of not knowing what exactly to give/reccomend. For ex
ample; I feel strongest in driving/building Stadium, but like to drive Canyon or Valley from to time to time. I know from my own experience - and it probably goes for any environment throughout TM - experienced building gets into a
lot of subtleties, and sometimes I don't really know what to recommend aside from the basics of creativity, flow, design, etc, and also if it's something that hasn't already been mentioned before in the award list. Maybe it's just my personality, but if I see something is said before, I usually don't want to repeat it unless it's something that really stands out. And with an evolving userbase, it's hard to nail down a single answer to it.
Last edited by Linkin|Alex,