aurovee says:
I would be only slightly miffed at my last place... But I want to call Lars' votes out as possibly unfair, and possibly the only reason why he won this month's MTC. I don't feel like he gave enough constructive critique on the maps he voted very low on, and the one map he did a decent vote with was still low.
A couple of observations:
1) If you were to throw out public judging altogether, you would have gotten 5th place instead of last place, and Lars still would have won.
2) If, alternately, you were to just throw out Lars' voting entirely, you still would have gotten 5th instead of last, and he still would have gotten second place.
Lars seems to be more cranky and critical than others, and his scoring window is shifted lower because of that, but it doesn't make that much difference overall. (Also, Lars actually gave you more helpful feedback than I did.)
In my opinion, it would be a lot more productive for you to consider the feedback you received (both public and from the site judges) instead of trying to make this about someone else. You obviously don't have to agree with that feedback, but it gives you an idea of what five people liked or disliked, and why your track didn't score as highly as others in this competition, subjective as that may be.
(Also, c'mon dude, this is a monthly video game track contest on the internet. There's another one every month. Breathe. Unclench.)