Nesrally says:
Any time frame for the "show more" ?

When I have time to add multi-mode search support to the leaderboards.

Forzyy says:

Nesrally says:
Any time frame for the "show more" ?

When I have time to add multi-mode search support to the leaderboards.

Ok, tnx forzyy...wish i could give u time as a "special gift".....hehehe Anyway, ur work is much appreciated !

Sorry if I missed this and it's already been asked but what LB does a track need to get to go classic when it's actually released or hasn't that been decided yet? Just curious

I think it hastn't been decided yet, tho I suppose you should earn trackvalue around 500 to get classic

I think the classic level is 1000.

BLUE ORCHID have 927 LB

Times: 00:49.066 - 00:49.641

Am i right or am i right.

There is no fix points level and there will be none most likely.
Because it is not only based on the points but also on the activity on a track.
So it's possible that in the future a track with 500 points will become classic while another track had over 1000 points when it became classic.

SPIDER (15031) says:
I think the classic level is 1000.

BLUE ORCHID have 927 LB ....

Ok 1000 can be cool but this limit is too high . For many tracks will unattainable . In my opinion the good limit for classic track is 500 - 600 points . All tracks that reach 700 points should be classic automatically and without any additional assumptions .
...... This only my opinion

SkunkY says:

There is no fix points level and there will be none most likely.
Because it is not only based on the points but also on the activity on a track.

Okay, but what do you mean?" activity on the track ". I think that this criterion can become a very controversial .
Many people will feel wrong . They will have high scores on the track , but they do not reach classic track because they have not activity on the track? . On tracks with a high score can not be a high activity , because people already can not give more better replays .
.... I think that the activity on the track should help only if the score on the track is less than 500 points , And people can not give replays because the track is too short for more variable times or for high difficulty of track .
On tracks that have more than 500 points should be a substantial number only .
....Again my opinion only



I personally thank for this new LB system . I think is the best system on tmx/mx sites ever

OLDA_X says:
On tracks with a high score can not be a high activity , because people already can not give more better replays .

This is correct. Now make a guess how the activity is taking influence.. it's the other way around.
Tracks with high activity will become classic later than ones where activities have faded.
And it's not the only thing that influences the date when a track becomes classic.

We never had fix point levels. It worked this way in the past and I don't see reasons why it shouldn't in the future.

well there is only one that is classic at 1000lb and 3 over 700 lb and a classic track is become classic, becouse many have played it over time and thats what a classic track are.

Diff: 0.500 is to little and 1 sec is a bit to much imo
but maybe, i say maybe <1 sec would be a good level, and when tracks is classic they will be played on again becouse it got classic and its start a new competition to be number one on classic tracks. but i think forzyy has some good level figured out.

Hey Guys,

tbh I'm to lazy to read all the 19 pages of this track to see if someone already asked this - but why is the lb-system here on MX another one than on TMX? If I understood it correctly this is a leaderboard where the nolifers will be first and the people who hunt once a month a bit have no chance to reach a good rank. I don't see the advantage in this leaderboard, maybe you can explain it to me

Greets