|
broadsword
|
The previous judging system had this rule often used in other official competitions, where the highest and lowest scores on each track were not included in the final ranking. Thus, the 'most extreme' votes (positive or negative) would not influence...
|
|
|
|
|
NitroGuy!
|
denny, flame, and rockys7 should be banned from voting in the future...it's clear they sabotaged the results. they gave a 1, 2 , 2 on voy's map with no explanation and a 10, 9, and 9 to Denny's map which was disqualified...almost all of their scores...
|
|
|
|
|
Space
|
unusually high votes can be as bad as unusually low votes, so I don't necessarily agree with your suggestion.
|
|
|
|
|
FT»lolig
|
heanry: why not add the additional rule as they all asked, but give it a twist.
why not add the rule: " you cannot give any vote under 5 unless: you can give a valid argument why you gave the track a 'bad' vote, or Explain why you gave that score....
|
|
|
|
|
Space
|
how about a rule that the judge has to have a track with 15+ awards or smth?
|
|
|
|
|
FT»lolig
|
I upvote the idea.
just simply make an MTC server on the 3(4) main nadeo titles
valley, stadium, canyon and envimix title.
these are the official titles.
and do not simply use only this months MTC maps but make a map pool of rotating mtc the...
|
|
|
|
|
haenry
|
Space, this classical way of judging maps failed many times in the past due to a lack of judges. It was very difficult or impossible to find 5 judges, who will judge all maps.
That's why I introduced the simple system of voting. I know that it is no...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Golo
|
Dont know if its possible to make a rule for this but I feel like it shouldnt be allowed to give every track bad scores except of one.
Anyways, nice mtc!
|
|
|
|